View from City Road: Finding a path through the borrowing maze
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The idea of a simple stand-alone number to unlock the mysteries for consumers of the charges for complex borrowing facilities has always been an appealing one. The APR, or annual percentage rate, was was one such great idea, but its time has passed. Certainly it helped to show the relative costs of different forms of borrowing. When you see a credit card at a mere 1.9 per cent a month, it helps to know that it translates to over 25 per cent APR.
But when it comes to making a decision about borrowing to buy a new hi-fi, the APR fails to give an accurate picture of the relative merits of an overdraft, personal loan or credit card borrowing.
Sir Bryan Carsberg, director-general of the Office of Fair Trading, wants to separate out the running interest costs from the fixed charges. The idea is to evaluate properly the cost of each borrowing decision. The fee for a credit card, for instance, will have already been paid by those contemplating using their cards for credit.
The Consumers' Association believes the initiative will muddy the waters. Greater efforts should be made to make the cost of different forms of borrowing comparable, it believes. Transparency is always preferable, however, and it is surely better to have two numbers that reflect the truth than a single misleading one. It is hardly beyond the wit of consumers to be able to cope with that.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments