Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Fidelity plays a dud

Wednesday 05 August 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FIDELITY has done itself few favours by arguing against the WPP restructuring as recently as last week, only to support it at yesterday's shareholders' meeting. Having stood out against the terms and lobbied hard, privately and publicly, for a better deal, it limply gave up the fight over the weekend.

It took Fidelity far too long to realise that the banks meant what they said when they threatened to put the advertising company into liquidation. Other investors had appreciated that the banks were serious much earlier.

When Fidelity next demands better terms in a restructuring, will anyone take it seriously?

Bankers will know that it has caved in before and, rightly or wrongly, will expect it to do so again. Other investors prepared to fight for better terms may prefer to team up with firms they reckon will stay the course.

You would have thought Boston-based Fidelity, one of the largest equity investors in the world, knew the risks it was taking. It has been involved in similar knife-edge deals before, on both sides of the Atlantic.

In 1989 it stood out against the terms of a restructuring of Hillsborough, an American buyout arranged by Kohlberg Kravis and Roberts, only to find it was the first Fortune 500 company to file for bankruptcy. Henry Kravis, then still powerfull on Wall Street, had meant what he said when he told Fidelity that KKR was prepared to file for Chapter 11.

It is natural enough that Fidelity should want a better deal for equity or preference share holders. But it has risked its reputation, at least in London, by pursuing its cause too hard.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in