View from City Road: BT is not off the regulation hook yet
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Potential investors in the forthcoming pounds 5bn sale of BT shares should not breathe too great a sigh of relief. Don Cruickshank, the new director- general of BT's regulator Oftel, yesterday ruled out a break-up of the telecoms monolith, but he also thinks that BT has had it too easy.
Only two months into the job, the new regulator is pushing for accounting separation of BT - with full allocation of the costs to different parts of the business. In so doing, he is giving BT's rivals the opportunity to accelerate their attack on the marketplace. Each service will have to show that it is being run commercially, without the sort of cross-subsidies that can scare off a financially less well-placed competitor.
The notion of accounting separation has been strongly resisted by BT as there has always been the thought that it could be a precursor to structural break-up of the company. Now Oftel, while rejecting break-up, wants accounting separation in the current financial year. The company, after all these years, is finally to be laid bare.
BT is also understood to be worried that Mr Cruickshank wants to deepen his powers - in particular taking the right to decide how BT should allocate its costs. The idea that the tentacles of regulation should go ever deeper into the company's affairs, even while competition increases, is something that Iain Vallance and his colleagues find hard to stomach.
For someone new to the industry, Mr Cruickshank has made a splash. True, he will not interfere with the new price control regime which takes effect in August and runs for four years. But regulators in Britain are still capable of making a lot of trouble for the regulated companies.
Mr Cruickshank believes BT will accept the changes rather than risk the alternative - a reference to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. BT, on the other hand, is battle- hardened and has looked down that route many times before. Either way, life looks far from comfortable for BT. Light- handed regulation seems to be a while away.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments