Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

View from City Road: Branson needs more than good intent

Monday 13 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The proposal to give the profits made by the National Lottery organisers to charity is inherently attractive. The publicist in Richard Branson will also, no doubt, do a wonderful marketing job. But a big idea on its own is not enough to win the contract. Mr Branson will still have to prove he can run the lottery better than the rival bidders.

The profit to be creamed off from the lottery operation will be strictly controlled by the regulator, whether it goes to charity or to dividends for investors.

It may be a handsome amount, in relation to the capital put into the operation. But the profit will be small compared with the money to be funnelled through the regulator into charities, which could be around a quarter of the total proceeds. A modest increase in the income of the lottery could produce extra funds for charity that dwarf those profits.

It is perfectly possible that one of the other proposals could produce a higher overall return for charity, simply by offering a more effective money-raising machine. This aspect, rather than the superficial attraction of not paying profits to investors, will remain the key to the decision.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in