View from City Road: Beware black holes in trade
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's economic recovery over the next few years will hinge on trade, so the possibility that imports were underestimated by pounds 9bn last year is alarming.
Imports from inside and outside the EU moved roughly in parallel after the mid-1980s, but this close relationship fell apart at the end of 1992 when the arrival of the single market meant that trade within the EU had to be measured through VAT returns rather than customs declarations at borders.
Since that time imports from within and outside the EU have diverged. Excluding oil and erratic items, import volumes from outside the EU in the three months to October were 11 per cent higher than a year earlier, while intra-EU import volumes fell by 7.5 per cent.
The economists at UBS fear that imports from the EU have been underestimated by pounds 9bn in the first 10 months of the year. Importers may be trying to avoid VAT. But the Central Statistical Office rejects such a 'black hole'. It says goods brought into Britain via entrepots like Rotterdam are now recorded as imports from their original point of departure, not the Netherlands.
But the evidence for the CSO's explanation is not entirely convincing. True, imports from the Benelux in the first 10 months of 1993 were down pounds 50m on 1992, while imports from the rest of the EU were up pounds 283m. But these figures are not big enough to explain the entire divergence. Most of the black hole remains. Beware nasty surprises.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments