View from City Road: Asking the question at GE Capital
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It is small wonder that 'Neutron' Jack Welch, chief executive of General Electric of the US, is incandescent with rage over the Kidder Peabody debacle; not only has it blown his record of unbroken earnings growth off course, but if rumours in the credit rating world are to believed, he is also about to lose his triple A debt rating to boot. Bankers are increasingly beginning to wonder, if GE knew nothing about the phantom profits being created in its Kidder offshoot, what are the controls on its fast- growing finance offshoot, GE Capital?
This is a business that has been growing at a phenomenal pace - 20 per cent per annum compound - and it now accounts for more than half GE's total profits. (General Electric, by the way, was once and still claims to be a consumer electronics company, but you would be hard pressed to realise that these days.) Over the past year there have been more than 40 acquisitions by GE Capital in Europe alone, including Guinness Peat Aviation and several car rental businesses.
GE's push for growth in the financial sector, taking on distress assets that no one else would touch, has left other bankers aghast. With all the capital and other controls that central bankers impose on them, there is no way they could match the breakneck pace achieved by GE Capital, a sort of non-bank bank which, because it does not take deposits, largely escapes supervisory control. Can GE Capital's growth be for real? After Kidder, there is reasonable cause to ask the question. That's what the credit rating agencies are doing.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments