Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Utilities to face profits clawbackclaw

Michael Harrison
Wednesday 25 March 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PRIVATISED utilities will have to share profits with customers where they are "unearned" or result from deliberately misleading regulators, under Government proposals unveiled yesterday.

The long-awaited Green Paper on utility regulation also sets out plans to bring the policing of the gas, electricity, water and telecoms industries under a greater degree of political control.

Shares prices of the privatised water companies rose in response to the decision, widely expected, not to alter the fundamental way in which prices are controlled. The Department of Trade and Industry had wanted to include a mechanism for capping excess profits but was overruled by the Treasury.

Individual regulators for each of the industries will be issued with statutory guidance requiring them to take the Government's wider social and environmental aims into account in policing the utilities.

This means that they could have an explicit obligation to protect the interests of poorer consumers and other disadvantaged groups through, for instance, cross-subsidisation of prices. The regulators would also have a new primary statutory duty to protect consumer interests.

However, the Government has decided to stick with the system of incentive regulation developed over the last 15 years whereby the RPI-X formula - which sets percentage price rises below inflation - is retained as "fundamental basis for price regulation".

This will allow companies to keep profits which result from greater efficiency. But alongside this the Government has proposed the introduction of an "error correction mechanism" which would allow excess profits to be clawed back promptly.

The mechanism would be triggered either when companies benefited from factors outside their control - for instance, a sudden drop in costs of supplies - or when they had deliberately misled regulators into setting too lenient a price cap by giving inaccurate or incomplete information.

Margaret Beckett, President of the Board of Trade, insisted the Government was not returning to Old Labour ways by penalising the utilities. She said a better deal for the consumer would be achieved by "competition where possible, regulation where necessary".

But John Redwood, the shadow Trade and Industry Secretary, said the proposals could amount to a "back door" tax on business and warned they could lead to permanent uncertainty about how much they could earn and afford to invest. "She should set a price control and live with it," he added.

The Green Paper also proposes:

The merger of the electricity and gas regulators, Offer and Ofgas, into a single energy regulator.

Separation of electricity supply (buying and selling of electricity) from distribution - the wires which deliver electricity.

Greater openness and accountability with a requirement on regulators to justify key decisions.

The Government said it had not ruled out the idea of advisory panels to aid individual regulators. Replies are being sought by the end of May.

Mrs Beckett said there was no reason why the review should not lead to lower prices but this would be achieved through a mixture of fairer regulation and the opening up of the markets to competition particularly in gas and electricity.

The proposals were broadly welcomed by the regulators themselves, consumer groups, and the industries involved.

Outlook, page 25

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in