US set to begin banana sanctions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE TRANSATLANTIC war over Europe's banana imports was plunged into a new and dangerous crisis last night after the US said it would go ahead with sanctions on $520m of European imports, while suspending payments, pending a World Trade Organisation ruling.
The American government said it would demand bonds from US importers to cover the cost of 100 per cent import tariffs on a range of goods.
Peter Scher, the US negotiator for agriculture, said: "It is only after exhausting every opportunity thus far to try to resolve this dispute that we have reached this position."
The move was attacked by the European Union, which demanded immediate consultations, and accused the US of effectively implementing a sanctions regime. Sir Leon Brittan, vice president of the European Commission, described the US action as "unacceptable and unlawful".
The suspended 100 per cent tariffs will be on a range of luxury goods, from cashmere sweaters to chandeliers. Importers would be liable to pay the punitive tariffs if the WTO gave the go-ahead, said Mr Scher. The tariffs would be imposed on goods imported now, but would be paid retroactively once the ruling occurred, he added.
Washington argues that the EU banana import regime is unfair to South American distributors, most of which are owned by US companies, because it allows preferential treatment for former European colonies including the Windward Islands.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments