Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Unilever hands back pounds 5bn to shareholders

Nigel Cope
Tuesday 23 February 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

UNILEVER, the Anglo-Dutch consumer products conglomerate whose brands include Persil and Flora, yesterday announced Britain's largest- ever return of cash to shareholders with a proposal to pay back pounds 5bn. Shareholders will receive a special dividend of 66.3p per share in June on top of the ordinary final dividend of 7.75p.

The payout is equivalent to 10.6 per cent of Unilever's stock market value. It dwarfs cash returns by other companies, which have included last week's pounds 1.5bn special dividend from Halifax.

Unilever said it was repaying the cash after failing to find suitable targets for major acquisitions. The company had been sitting on a huge cash pile after selling its speciality chemicals division to ICI for pounds 5bn in May 1997. Unilever had wanted to target emerging markets in the Far East and Latin America but found prices too high. "We have looked at a number of target companies but we are not convinced that any of them would give value to our shareholders," said Niall FitzGerald, the chairman. "Sometimes management's egos cash push people to do a deal. But we have decided that prices are just too high."

There had been speculation that Unilever might have looked at US companies such as Heinz and Best Foods, the former CPC group whose brands include Knorr soups and Skippy peanut spread. In the UK it has been linked with Reckitt & Colman, the Lemsip and Harpic household products group which issued a profits warning recently.

Analysts applauded the Unilever move, though the shares closed a penny lower at 624.5p after strong early gains. "It is a recognition that Unilever intends to reward shareholders and thus is very positive move. It would have been easy to have destroyed value," said Tim Potter, food industry analyst at Merrill Lynch.

Other analysts said the move might prompt other Anglo-Dutch groups such as Shell to return funds to shareholders after Unilever overcame tax problems that had previously hindered such moves.

Unilever's pounds 5bn payout will leave the group with pounds 1bn of net debt, though its healthy cash-generation will make the balance sheet strong enough for significant deals, analysts said.

The announcement came as Unilever revealed an 11 per cent increase in operating profits to pounds 3bn, before exceptional items. European sales were hit by lower ice-cream sales and the economic troubles in Russia. However, the launch of laundry tablets boosted Persil's market share. In the US, the Elizabeth Arden fragrance business returned to profit.

In the Far East, profits fell by 13 per cent due to the economic turmoil, but margins and market share were maintained.

Mr FitzGerald said the re-shaping of the group would continue, with 6 per cent of the business in the "underperforming" category compared with 20 per cent two years ago.

He also fired a warning shot at suppliers struggling to ensure their systems are millennium-compliant. He said 10-15 per cent were at risk of having their contracts terminated if they could not ensure supply.

Outlook, page 19

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in