UK tobacco firms await court ruling on cancer victims' claims
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Court of Appeal will today decide whether 43 lung cancer victims can pursue their legal action against the UK's largest cigarette producers. The vital ruling could pave the way for a flood of claims against Imperial Tobacco and Gallaher running into billions of pounds
In a landmark case the 43 cancer victims are suing Imperial Tobacco and Gallaher for negligence in not warning customers about the risk of the lung cancer and failing to reduce the level of tar in cigarettes when they discovered links between smoking and the disease.
Denied legal aid, the victims have been forced to employ law firms on a no-win, no-fee basis. However, Gallaher and Imperial are maintaining that the solicitors should be liable for the tobacco industry's legal costs as well as their clients' if the action eventually fails.
This could saddle the solicitors with a bill of as much as pounds 20m, a risk they are unlikely to accept. If they are forced to pull out of the case then the 43 litigants would have little choice but to call off the action. Not only that, the ruling would set a precedent which could scupper any future claims.
However if the victims are successful in quashing the tobacco company's case it would remove the last major obstacle in the legal action, which is due to go to court next year. Such an action could turn out to be hugely costly for Imperial and Gallaher and force the companies to submit thousands of potentially damaging documents to the court.
More importantly it could open the floodgates, prompting a huge number of lung cancer victims to pursue their own cases, which could have devastating consequences for the industry. The situation in the US, where threat of escalating legal action has forced tobacco companies into a deal that could cost them hundreds of billions of dollars, could be mirrored in the UK.
Clive Bates, director of Ash, the anti-smoking lobby group, said: "If the tobacco industry wins, all further prospects for litigation in the UK look doomed, at least for the foreseeable future. If the victims win, the legal cases will start gathering momentum. The law is only now waking up to the fact that these companies are responsible for killing half their customers and 120,000 people a year in the UK."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments