Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Two Wickes directors suspended

Friday 28 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two directors of Wickes, the troubled DIY group, have been suspended as part of the investigations into accounting errors that led to an over- statement of the group's profits, writes Nigel Cope.

Les Rosenthal, group trading director, and Chris Miles, UK commercial director, were yesterday suspended from the business pending the completion of the investigation being undertaken by Price Waterhouse.

They will continue to co-operate fully with the investigation. However, the company said the pair would "have no further dealings with suppliers customers or staff".

It is understood that the problems could stretch back three or four years with the possible over-statement of profits amounting to pounds 15m-pounds 20m. It is unlikely the company will be to announce a more precise figure for at least a week to enable the shares to resume trading. They were suspended at 69p.

Henry Sweetbaum, the former chairman who resigned this week, is understood to have retained City law firm Herbert Smith to act on his behalf, though this was not confirmed. It is possible he could claim compensation for loss of office as his contract was not due to expire until November 1997.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in