Treasury offered face-saving ISA deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government was yesterday urged to adopt a face-saving formula that would allow its Individual Savings Account to replace Tessas and PEPs - without leaving savers "drowning in paper".
As the Treasury closed its consultation on ISAs, the savings industry said it now expected the Treasury to compromise on proposals to limit savings to pounds 50,000 by allowing PEPs to be frozen as they are.
Geoffrey Robinson, the Treasury minister in charge of the ISA, this week said he accepted concerns that current proposals could cause serious admin problems which would affect savers and providers alike.
The Association of British Insurers and Autif, two trade bodies which represent the majority of the savings market, want a compromise formula to change proposals they call "costly, complex and possibly unworkable".
Under the formula, PEPs would be frozen as they are - rather than being transferred into an ISA - and will keep all current tax benefits. This will stop providers rushing to bring out complex systems to allow PEP savers to transfer to ISAs.
But the formula would allow the Government to keep the pounds 50,000 limit on new ISAs, which are intended to slash the pounds 1.2bn annual cost to the Treasury of tax reliefs for PEPs and Tessas.
M&G, one of the leading providers of PEPs, has also mooted another compromise formula which would involve abolishing the pounds 50,000 lifetime limit. In exchange, the Treasury could cut the 10 per cent tax credit on the growth of savings which it has proposed to pay.
M&G believes the current proposals mean savers will be flooded with forms.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments