Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Timeshare company wound up

Sue Fieldman
Saturday 18 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GOLDEN PORTFOLIO, the controversial timeshare company based in Milton Keynes, has been wound up. The company owes thousands of pounds to creditors, with assets of only about pounds 8,000.

More than pounds 184,000 is owed to members of the public for inducements, such as video recorders, to attend timeshare promotions.

In December 1991 the Independent on Sunday highlighted Golden Portfolio's selling techniques. Families were misled into attending timeshare presentations by the offer of an award, which did not materialise. After the sales pitch, the prize was always mysteriously out of stock. The families later received a certificate enabling them to claim the prize. But it was from another company and there was a new condition attached: a pounds 39.95 delivery charge.

At the time we asked Golden Portfolio questions about the missing prizes but the company would not comment.

Golden Portfolio was then charged with 22 offences in relation to its allegedly misleading sales techniques.

Tony Thompson, insolvency partner at KPMG Peat Marwick, says: 'There are many matters which require investigation. Top of my list will be to establish whether the business was carried on to defraud creditors and also if assets were disposed of prior to liquidation at below value.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in