Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Time to rethinkinvestor compensation

Friday 16 June 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If you believe the Treasury, all those stories about looming insolvency for the Investors Compensation Scheme are a storm in a teacup. The problem would in any case go away if Sun Life's application for a judicial review is rejected by the courts. If the courts decide otherwise, some kind of temporary bridging arrangement can no doubt be put in place. By its own admission Sun Life doesn't want to destroy the scheme by challenging it in the courts; the idea is merely to ensure that contributions do not fall foul of the company's obligations to policyholders.

So if there is no real problem, why tinker with a system that has paid out pounds 80m since being set up in 1988? Well, here are a few good reasons. The scheme's upper limit of pounds 48,000is woefully inadequate. There are also doubts whether it is in a fit state to meet future obligations. Many of the independent financial advisers that fund it are throwing in the towel.The PIA should use the opportunity to rethink the scheme, perhaps by replacing the current system of levies on individual companies with an industry-wide product levy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in