Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

`The system is a complete shambles'

John Murray
Wednesday 15 March 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The former Prudential chief said yesterday that his future career now lay outside the insurance industry, writes John Murray.

Speaking for the first time since his abrupt departure from the Pru - on the day he was cleared by the Stock Exchange - Mick Newmarch said: "I have in my mind's eye a rough idea of the sort of thing I want to do next. It certainly will not be in the insurance industry. I would like to get into a business that is perhaps a bit sleepy and needs galvanising - something with a challenge."

He said he was pleased that his ordeal at the hands of the Stock Exchange was over, and launched another characteristic broadside against the regulators, describing the system as "a complete shambles".

He insisted that he had not resigned because of the investigation into his share dealings.

"The outcome of the Stock Exchange's deliberations does not make me regret my decision to resign. In any case, I didn't resign over this, I resigned over a much more elaborate set of provocations.

"I found the attitude of the regulatory authorities increasingly unacceptable as it was damaging to me personally and to the company I was trying to do a job for."

Mr Newmarch also maintained that it was his own decision to go. "Although I was put under no pressure from my colleagues at the Pru to resign, I think they understood my reasons so knew there was little point in trying to dissuade me.

"I still believe that the regulatory system as it is currently structured is a complete shambles.

"All I ever asked for was an independent review of the structure. I strongly suspect that any proper review would come to the conclusion that the present system should be replaced with a single statutory regulator for retail financial services.

"The problem at the moment is that the regulators have contempt for the people they are regulating.

"The current system is incompetent, fails to protect the interests of consumers or the industry and is arbitrary. I was also not alone in voicing these concerns. You might accuse me of political naivety for not trimming, but I was not prepared to do that as I was responsible for defending the interests of the company and its 7 million policyholders.

"I am not bitter about the whole thing and I'm not going to get paranoid - although some people have suggested that the role of the Treasury in all of this has been a curious coincidence.

"It has been said to me that it may have been in their interests to discredit me."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in