The Maxwell Trial; Day 30; Accountant faces criticism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN WILLCOCK
Financial Correspondent
Remarks made by the accountant Ian Huntingdon about Robert Maxwell's business methods were criticised at an Old Bailey fraud trial yesterday.
Mr Huntingdon, a former assistant director of the Serious Fraud Squad who had been involved in the Maxwell investigation, was said to have made comments that were published in the accountancy magazine Fighting Fraud.
Mr Alun Jones QC, defending the tycoon's son, Kevin, asked if the comments suggested Robert Maxwell "had been engaged in fraud". Mr Huntingdon, a partner with KPMG, replied: "It is capable of being read that way. But it does not make a statement as such."
Counsel then asked another accountant if Mr Huntingdon should have said anything at all when he knew there was a trial pending at which the guilt or innocence of Robert Maxwell was at issue. "I expect the person concerned wished he had not done it," replied Mr Keith Woodley, president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants. Mr Woodley, who stressed that he was giving evidence in a private capacity, was called as an accountancy expert to advise the jury on the duties and responsibilities of company directors and auditors.
Shown the accounts for the Robert Maxwell Group for the year to 31 December 1990, he said that they indicated that from a cash-flow point of view the company was under "financial strain" even though the assets were considerably in excess of the debts. The trial was adjourned until today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments