The best and worst: With-profit surrender values of endowment policies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Surrender values after 10 years of a 25-year endowment policy; taken out by a man 29 years old and a woman 26 (non-smokers). Sum assured: pounds 30,000. Source: Money Management
IT WOULD not be wise to choose an endowment policy solely on the basis of what it would repay should you cash it in early. But surrender values should perhaps be given more thought, given that some companies pay thousands more than others, according to figures in the latest issue of Money Management.
This is true for both with- profit endowments and unit- linked, though with-profits surrender values exceed those of unit-linked policies because of the reversionary bonuses locked into them.
Prolific's excuse for low surrender values is that its with-profits fund is small and paying over-generous surrender values would jeopardise its ability to provide maturity payouts sufficient to cover the mortgages the policies back.
Scottish Life argues that its premiums are lower than those of some other companies, so it cannot be expected to produce the same level of surrender values.
Ray Milne of Scottish Life insists that many prospective house-buyers are more interested in low premiums than high surrender values.
But Scottish Life still offers premiums which are by no means the cheapest. Equitable Life's current premiums, for instance, are generally at the low end of the range. Its policy-holders seem to have the best of both worlds: good surrender values and reasonable premiums.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ With-profit surrender values ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The best (pounds) 1 Equitable Life 9,974 2 Cooperative 9,176 3 Britannic Assurance 9,125 4 Royal London 8,655 5 Wesleyan 8,398 The worst 26 National Mutual 6,542 27 General Accident 6,289 28 London Life 6,282 29 Scottish Life 5,916 30 Prolific 5,636 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments