Tay in row over changingdirectors' contracts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TAY HOMES, the troubled housebuilder, was plunged into a furious row yesterday after it emerged that two top executives signed new contracts doubling their notice period after rebuffing an attempt by a rebel investor to change the board.
The Leeds-based company - which is facing a shareholder vote to oust the board at the end of the month - angrily denied suggestions that the chairman Norman Stubbs and the chief executive John Swanson had decided to increase the notice period for fear of being forced out by shareholders.
The length of the period is a crucial element in determining compensation packages for ousted directors. Outgoing executives normally receive a lump sum based on their annual salary multiplied by their notice period.
According to documents seen by the Independent, Mr Swanson and Mr Norman Stubbs signed the contracts extending their notice from six months to a year on 10 November.
This was around two weeks after a meeting with Sunley, a family-owned housebuilder with a 10 per cent stake in Tay. At the meeting, Sunley proposed the appointment of two of its nominees to the board in an attempt to improve Tay's performance and revive its flagging share price.
The board's rejection of the proposal led Sunley, backed by Philips & Drew, Tay's largest investor, to call the meeting to oust the existing management.
Mr Swanson yesterday said the changes to the notice period had been agreed in June by the company's remuneration committee. He said the contracts were not signed until November because lawyers had taken a long time to draw them up.
"The insinuation that we changed the contracts as a result of our meeting (with Sunley)... is tantamount to absolute nonsense," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments