Talks fail to defuse Refuge merger row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A row threatening the proposed pounds 1.4bn merger between Refuge Assurance and its rival United Friendly looked no closer to being resolved last night, writes Nic Cicutti.
Senior executives from both insurace groups held a lengthy meeting yesterday with Perpetual, a leading Refuge shareholder which is opposed to the deal.
Neil Woodford, income fund manager at Perpetual, said that while the meeting had been cordial, he still had to make up his mind on the issues at stake.
"The meeting at our offices in Henley-on-Thames was lengthy and very detailed," Mr Woodford said. "The other sides put their case very forcefully and we have some very important decisions to make in the next week or so.
"I do not want to prejudice things by saying how I feel about things at the moment because there will now need to be some discussions with analysts and others."
Mr Woodford added that during the meeting he was left in no doubt that John Cudworth, Refuge chief executive, and George Mack, United Friendly's current finance director and chief executive-designate in the merged insurer, both strongly believed in the benefits of the deal to both shareholders and policyholders.
But Perpetual, which owns about 7 per cent of Refuge shares, still needs to be satisfied about those benefits before it would vote in favour of the merger at a special meeting of shareholders next month. Neither Mr Cudworth nor Mr Mack could be contacted for comment yesterday.
The wrangle between Perpetual and Refuge centres on the exact proportion of the pounds 500m of so-called "orphan assets", which are attributable to shareholders before the merger with United Friendly takes place.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments