Takeover to raise prices, says Ofwat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The water industry watchdog Ofwat has warned that the planned takeover of South West Water by Severn Trent could lead to higher bills, poorer services and lower investment for customers in the Midlands.
The concerns are voiced in a letter from Clive Wilkinson, chairman of the Ofwat customer service committee for the region, to local MPs, local authorities and consumer groups.
Mr Wilkinson is particularly concerned about what might happen to prices, pointing out that the average domestic water and sewage bill for Severn Trent customers is pounds 201 compared with pounds 329 for householders in the South- west.
"Any policy of bill harmonisation could increase charges to existing Severn Trent customers significantly," he writes.
The letter also highlights other problem areas such as the danger that Severn Trent will be inhibited from funding its own capital investment programme by the cost of mounting a bid for South West.
Mr Wilkinson goes on to warn that the "substantial numbers of senior executives" that would need to be diverted from Severn Trent to South West to make the takeover successful was bound to weaken its ability to deliver improved services. The letter also questions what level of job losses would occur.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments