Swift plans to hand rail routes to rivals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FAILING rail companies could be relieved of running services in certain areas under radical plans put forward by the rail regulator yesterday. John Swift QC, the industry regulator, watered down proposals for even greater competition and head-on battles between rail companies and instead plumped for tightening his grip on the rail network.
Next year's winter timetable will allow train companies to apply to run a rival's services - if Mr Swift considers they are failing to meet adequately their customers' demands.
The new policy will allow up to 20 per cent of a train operator's revenue to be up for grabs by rival companies in 1999. More competition could follow if Mr Swift's plans are a success - with a review of the system pencilled in for 2002.
Mr Swift did not give a definition of a "failing service" but the regulator has considerable control over track access charges and timetabling. Mr Swift said the policy would place "additional incentives" on train companies to "achieve and maintain greater benefits for passengers through improved services or lower fares".
At present, train operators enjoy complete protection withintheir franchise area under track access agreements with Railtrack.
There should be little new cost to the taxpayer, according to Mr Swift. "I expect this policy to lead to the introduction of new services such as airport links, services to new developments, to shopping and leisure centres, and park and ride sites, and cross-regional services."
Some train companies have privately voiced their concerns. Connex - which runs two large franchises in the South-east - has made it clear it would prefer no competition. Last year Connex South Central dropped 300 trains from its timetable - at the time many experts said another company should have stepped in to run the service.
Some companies have already launched competing services. The route between London and Peterborough is served by both GNER and WAGN, which last year bought out a "dedicated" annual season ticket for pounds 1,000 less than GNER's.
Outlook, page 21
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments