State compensation scheme misused to 'casualise' docks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PORT employers have 'systematically abused' a state-funded scheme to make more than 7,000 dockers redundant, according to research published today. More than pounds 130m of taxpayers' money has been poured into severence pay for 'registered' port workers, many of whom were taken back by the same companies on reduced terms and conditions.
The government severance arrangement was announced in 1989 when ministers repealed the National Dock Labour Scheme, which provided employment protection for registered dockers.
Despite ministerial assurances, many of the ex-registered dockers now work on a casual basis, and such forms of employment are now widespread throughout the industry, Cardiff Business School says in its report The Price Of Deregulating Britain's Ports.
The research - funded by the Economic and Social Research Council - found that 7,200 of the former 9,220 registered dockers had been made redundant under the Dock Labour Compensation Scheme.
A survey of 800 former registered employees found that more than 80 per cent of them felt they had no choice but to accept severance.
This level of redundancy which was 'way in excess' of government estimates, cost the taxpayer pounds 132m and the port employers around pounds 100m, according to the report.
The total cost to the Government of abolishing the dock scheme, however, is estimated to be much higher as a result of unemployment and other benefits paid to redundant dockers.
Researchers say that there is very little the Transport and General Workers' Union can do to fight the 'casualisation' of the industry. The union has been 'de-recognised' in many ports, and activists were the first to be selected for redundancy.
The union's biennial delegate conference starting in Bournemouth will attack the practice of sacking democratically elected representatives.
'The Price of Deregulating Britain's Ports: The socio-economic costs of the Dock Labour Compensation Scheme', published by the Cardiff Business School, University of Wales, Aberconway Building, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF1 3EU.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments