Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Society calls in law firm for pounds 8m case

Maria Scott
Saturday 22 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LANCASHIRE & Yorkshire Friendly Society has asked the Manchester law firm Eversheds Alexander Tatham to organise representation for members in a court action that could result in a compensation bill of up to pounds 8.2m.

Problems at L & Y came to light at the end of last year, when new managers discovered that many policies had been invested in properties, which had been making a loss, when the original terms of the policies excluded this. The society is seeking a High Court ruling on the validity of these investments.

The society manages nearly pounds 100m and has 70,000 policyholders. Antony Gold, a partner in Eversheds Alexander Tatham - which represented victims of the Barlow Clowes scandal - said it would be appointing barristers for the members, who will fall into as many as four groups with separate sets of interests.

L & Y may also seek a ruling on the status of certain policies funded by lump sums. There is a question as to whether these were eligible for the usual tax exemption that applies to a friendly society.

A third problem, concerning doubts about tax exemption on a number of policies that were put on the market before their terms had been approved by the Registry of Friendly Societies, has been resolved with the Inland Revenue, however. Investors will not lose any tax relief.

L & Y's annual report, sent to investors, put the potential costs of the unresolved problems over property investment and the lump sum-funded policies at more than pounds 8m. The maximum liability for the property fund investment is estimated at pounds 6.2m; for the lump sum investments it is slightly more than pounds 2m.

L & Y expects the judgment to give guidance on how investors should be compensated, if it is decided this is necessary.

John Ramsden, the society's chairman, said that it was possible that the burden would have to be shared among all investors - even those who had suffered as a result of the society's actions - through a levy.

L & Y is not taking on new business at present.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in