Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The decommissioning body which becomes responsible for £48bn of Britain's nuclear liabilities on 1 April has been attacked by MPs for being "soft" towards contractors in not threatening financial penalties for failure to deliver.
The decommissioning body which becomes responsible for £48bn of Britain's nuclear liabilities on 1 April has been attacked by MPs for being "soft" towards contractors in not threatening financial penalties for failure to deliver.
The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority has drawn up contracts that take effect at the start of next month for the lucrative work of dismantling the UK's nuclear facilities. The main contractors for the first phase of the process are the UK Atomic Energy Authority and British Nuclear Group, the clean-up arm of the state-owned BNFL.
But MPs are worried that the two contractors will not offer value for money for the taxpayer, who is footing the bill.
During a grilling by MPs last week, Dr Ian Roxburgh, the chief executive of the NDA, admitted there were no penalties in place if the contractors did not carry out the work as promised.
If performance was appalling or there were cost overruns, the contractor would lose its profit on the work and its reputation would suffer, he said. But its costs would still be met, and there would be no other penalty.
Lindsay Hoyle, who is on the Trade and Industry Select Committee, told The Independent on Sunday: "Everything is an incentive to deliver but there is no penalty. That is the biggest worry about the contracts. The NDA's approach is a little bit soft. If contractors get it wrong, they must know there will be a problem."
Another committee member, Sir Robert Smith, said: "Without penalties built into the contracts, there is a concern whether the NDA would be able to ensure robust delivery."
There are also concerns over the relationship between the NDA and Nirex, the independent nuclear waste regulator. Nirex will advise the authority on how to package the decommissioned material, but has yet to sign a contract with it.
The dispute echoes criticism last week of the public-private partnership on the London Underground. Infrastructure consortia Tubelines and Metronet had little incentive to improve efficiency as the penalties were too weak, said a report by MPs.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments