Single bank overlord will 'damage US'
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Reuter) - Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve Chairman, yesterday reiterated his opposition to President Clinton's plan for a single bank regulator, saying it would hurt both the economy and the Fed's ability to manage a crisis.
Giving testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Mr Greenspan said: 'We must avoid a regulatory structure that inhibits economic growth. Removing the Federal Reserve from supervision and regulation would greatly reduce our ability to forestall financial crises and to manage a crisis once it occurs.'
Last November, the Treasury Department unveiled a proposal to merge the regulatory duties of the four existing bank agencies into a Federal Banking Commission - a plan that must be approved by Congress. The Fed's regulatory powers would be scaled back.
Mr Greenspan said there should not be 'a single monolithic federal regulator' and that every bank should have a choice of regulator. He argued that the Fed should continue to be involved.
He also made a renewed pitch for the Fed's own proposal to replace the four existing regulators with two and give the Fed control over 7,000 more banks.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments