Shareholders say no to Sugar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PRIVATE shareholders in Amstrad yesterday demanded that the company split the role of chairman and managing director.
Their move followed the rejection of a proposed pounds 113m buyout of the consumer electronics company by Alan Sugar, who holds both posts.
Although shareholders yesterday welcomed the failure of his offer, they are stepping up a campaign to split the two roles.
Gerard Lakemaker, a private shareholder, yesterday revealed that he was lobbying institutional shareholders on the issue.
He said: 'It is all very well to reject Mr Sugar's proposal on high moral grounds. We now want to be constructive and I feel strongly that the roles of chairman and managing director be split.'
His comments came as the company announced that proxies sent for today's court meeting showed that almost 60 per cent of shareholders voted against the offer. Amstrad has 31,500 shareholders of which 7,827 proxies were against, compared with 5,259 for the terms. In addition, 50.7 per cent of shares were voted against, and 49.3 per cent in favour.
Proxies sent for the shareholders' meeting also signalled defeat as the number of shares voted against was similar. Mr Sugar required a 75 per cent majority for the offer to succeed.
A spokesman said: 'It is technically possible to win but practically impossible. We can assume that the offer won't be accepted.'
He confirmed that Mr Sugar would continue to run Amstrad and that he had no immediate plans to dispose of his 35 per cent stake.
'As chairman he has discharged his duty to shareholders. He is not going to rush out flogging his shares.'
Amstrad shares fell 1p to 24p.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments