Shareholders reject proposal to break up Greycoat's assets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Shareholders in Greycoat yesterday rejected a resolution calling for the sale of all the embattled property company's assets.
The break-up proposal, which had been put forward by UK Active Value, a fund which speaks for 10.6 per cent of Greycoat, was defeated by 68.4 million votes to 3.6 million.
"This result shows an overwhelming majority against UKAV's proposal," said Michael Beckett, Greycoat's chairman. "We can now get back to work without this costly distraction."
Mr Beckett claimed "95 per cent support for our management and its strategy", even though shareholders owning 54.8 per cent of Greycoat's equity voted against the resolution, with 2.9 per cent in favour.
UKAV did not vote on the proposal and Brian Myerson, who runs the fund, did not attend the meeting.
Mr Myerson had already indicated he would abstain in the vote after reaching a deal with Greycoat's management to sell one of its trophy properties, Embankment Place in central London. Greycoat claims the sale of the building has been planned for many months.
Before the vote Mr Beckett revealed that cost of holding the EGM and its adjournment was about pounds 300,000, equivalent to a 20 per cent increase in the dividend. "Even more significantly it has been an enormous and costly diversion of management time and effort," he said.
Despite yesterday's vote, Greycoat's future remains uncertain. Last month Moorfield Estates, a rival property group about a quarter of Greycoat's size by market capitalisation, tabled proposals for a pounds 214m takeover bid, which Greycoat is resisting.
Moorfield wants to demerge two of Greycoat's biggest investment properties - Embankment Place and 123 Buckingham Palace Road, also in central London - into a company with a separate listing.
Last month Greycoat rejected outline proposals sent by Moorfield.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments