Shareholder fights Locker takeover plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER RODGERS
Business Editor
Plans by the quoted engineering company Thomas Locker to buy Pentre (Holdings) yesterday ran into fierce opposition from Locker's largest single shareholder.
John Carr, a private investor who bought 22.6 per cent of Locker last May, wrote to the rest of the shareholders over the weekend urging them to vote against the board's plans for a takeover that he said would cost pounds 10m, including the price for redeeming Pentre preference shares.
Thomas Locker is a long-established family-dominated company based in Warrington which makes air filters and mechanical handling equipment such as conveyors.
Mr Carr said he bought his stake from a disgruntled family member. The rest of the family still owns a total of 37 per cent of the company.
Mr Carr said he bought his stake with the intention of encouraging quiet change at Thomas Locker.
In July he asked for a seat on the board but the directors "procrastinated". In November they asked for a meeting but in December they said they were not interested in talking, Mr Carr said. "They are a very old established company. They were panicked into thinking I was aggressive but I am not. If it had been a sensible transaction I would have been the first to support it," he said.
He believed that it was wrong for Locker to double its size by acquisition and turn itself into something out of character. It would be better for the company to inject strong management and focus on the existing business, he said.
Mr Carr said he wanted to become directly involved and added that the role he had always played in companies in which he had been involved was chief executive.
The acquisition was in fact a reverse takeover, Mr Carr claimed. In a circular to shareholders he claimed Thomas Locker was valued at 58.6 per cent of net asset value while Pentre was valued at 225 per cent, giving "an extraordinary sum of pounds 4.3m of goodwill for Pentre .... Thomas Locker is significantly overpaying for Pentre."
Shares in Thomas Locker were suspended because of the takeover announcement at 30p, valuing the company on the stock market at pounds 9m, compared with shareholders' funds of pounds 15m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments