Services make countries rich, says Bank
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The world's most successful economies are those where services make the biggest contribution to growth. Poorer economies are those where growth depends substantially on manufacturing, according to a paper to be published in the Bank of England's Quarterly Bulletin on Wednesday.
The paper concludes: "The term `industrialised countries' no longer carries any resonance. Now, no advanced and growing country is dependent on production industries."
As developed economies grow, more and more of their GDP depends on economic activities that have little physical manifestation, ranging from haircuts and stocking supermarket shelves to financial services and software. Author Danny Quah, a professor at the London School of Economics, calls them "increasingly weightless economies".
He writes in the Bank's Bulletin: "Some economists doubt if the basis of a strong, growing economy can be provided by services in general or information technology in particular." He addresses the question by calculating what share of growth across a range of rapidly developing countries since 1972 has been due to services as opposed to industry - the closest available split in existing figures between "heavy" and "weightless" activities.
The US provides a benchmark, with its GDP growth slowing from more than 10 per cent in 1972-77 to just under 6 per cent in 1987-92. Services accounted for 57 per cent of the growth during the first period, but 81 per cent in the latest five years. The US manufacturing sector could account for as little as 15 per cent of the economy within 10 years.
The figures show that, contrary to popular perception, services have also accounted for between a third and nine-tenths of the economic growth in countries such as Korea, Singapore and the Philippines. The "newly industrialising" tiger economies have also relied heavily on services. In Singapore, for example, this sector contributed nearly two-thirds of the 18 per cent growth from 1972-77 and a similar proportion of the 20 per cent growth in 1987-92.
In general, across a wide range of developed and developing countries, the higher the contribution of services to growth, the higher per capita GDP.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments