Scholl puts case against shake-up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID HELLIER
Scholl, the footwear group besieged by corporate agitators Julian Treger and Brian Myerson, yesterday accused dissident shareholders of secrecy and short-termism as they implored them to vote against resolutions favouring a board shake-up.
To win over shareholder support, the company said its pre-tax profits for the first eight months of this year were 20% up on the corresponding period last year and that its business plan was on track.
The new chief executive, Colin Brown, formerly with Reckitt and Colman as group director Europe, said: "I intend to accelerate the improvement in Scholl's performance, concentrating on volume growth, increasing margins and reductions in fixed costs. This is the best way to maximise value for shareholders."
Mr Treger and Mr Myerson, and Claudia Perkins of J O Hambro, the finance house whose clients have built up a stake of more than 10%, have called a meeting for 24 October at which they intend to appoint themselves in place of three non-executive directors and seek buyers for the business.
Mr Treger believes Scholl would be better off as part ofan international group that would benefit from a worldwide marketing and distribution set- up. Yesterday he said Scholl's latest riposte did not address the central issue, which was that the company would be better off owned by somebody else.
Scholl said yesterday the proposed appointees have little relevant experience to the company. Nor did it think a forced sale was the way to achieve full value for shareholders.
Scholl's shares moved up 3p to 232p on the announcement.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments