Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sacked BET head wins pounds 3m in compensation

Peter Rodgers Financial Editor
Wednesday 16 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

John Clark, the chief executive sacked from BET after a takeover by Rentokil Initial, yesterday won pounds 3m in compensation, in a decision that could dramatically increase the size of future executive payoffs.

Although Mr Clark received only half the pounds 6m he asked for, because he failed to win an additional pounds 3m claim for lost share options, the court awarded him the full benefit of his three-year rolling contract.

Normally executives receive much less than the full amount of their contracts, because the payoffs are negotiated downward when they depart.

The award stunned Rentokil Initial, which called it an "enormous sum" and announced it would appeal. It is four times the pounds 750,000 Rentokil Initial paid into court before the case, and three times the pounds 1m that Mr Clark said he offered to settle for, shortly after he was dismissed in April.

However, a Rentokil Initial spokesman said the company was astonished by the claim that Mr Clark had offered to settle for pounds 1m. "Our final offer was pounds 950,000 and we never received an offer to settle for pounds 1m."

Mr Clark, 55, said he had offered to have the matter referred to independent arbitration so that it could be dealt with quickly and privately to save pounds 600,000 legal costs, which Rentokil's shareholders will now have to pay.

He said he was now eager to continue his search for a "new challenge" as chief executive in a big organisation.

During the hearing, there were claims from Rentokil Initial's side that Mr Clarke had spent the summer playing golf and had not seriously looked for a job, and counter claims that it was unlikely that somebody his age could find another post as chief executive.

Mr Justice Timothy Walker rejected suggestions by BET that Mr Clark had not taken proper steps to mitigate his financial loss by seeking alternative employment.

The judge accepted evidence from a consultant who said he could recall only two instances when clients had accepted applicants over the age of 55.

The award was for loss of pounds 490,000 salary - including increases - during the three-year notice period to which he was entitled under his rolling contract, plus damages for loss of pension rights, bonus payments of 50 per cent of salary, an executive car and chauffeur, health insurance and the value of holiday entitlement.

Mr Clark was head-hunted by BET in 1991. He much improved the group's fortunes and there was no suggestion he was sacked for failure.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in