Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rush to meet ISA deadline

There may not be many products to choose from next April

Isabel Berwick
Saturday 02 May 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE FIRST individual savings accounts (ISAs) will go on sale next April. But leading insurers are concerned that the timescale is getting almost too tight to be workable - legislation to set up ISAs is not expected to be passed until the end of July. The delays mean that would-be ISA buyers could find there are very few products to choose from when PEPs and Tessas are scrapped.

The draft regulations for ISAs were originally expected last month, but the Inland Revenue is now looking to publish them in mid-May. There will be a consultation period of just six weeks, during which firms planning to offer ISAs will be able to give their opinions. But the final legislation has to be ready in July to get it passed before the recess.

Alasdair Buchanan, marketing consultant at Scottish Life, says: "We haven't seen anything yet. They are really rushing things and there is a general concern: how can we get everything up and running? We will have less than nine months to develop new products and computer systems and test them. That goes for both ends - the ISA providers and the Revenue."

The biggest computer problem is that ISAs can be made up of three components - a cash deposit account, a life fund, and equity investments to replace PEPs. Firms planning to offer these "maxi-ISAs", which will allow savers to combine all three elements, face problems in linking three different computer systems. That comes on top of their efforts to get round the millennium bug problem.

There may also be legal hitches: life companies cannot sell PEPs, and a unit trust firm cannot offer life policies. Many firms will have to set up subsidiaries to be able to offer the full ISA range, or they may team up with other businesses to run joint ISAs. It will be a costly and time-consuming process.

Adrian Boulding at Legal & General says the firm has a large dedicated IT team and expects to be ready to offer ISAs from day one. Other firms may not be so organised, though he is sure the Inland Revenue will be ready for ISAs. The Revenue itself is keeping quiet. A spokeswoman says: "We are developing as we go along to deal with ISAs."

The ISA problem may be solved in the short term through intense political pressure to get the systems up and running in time for next April. But there is a much bigger headache looming in the shape of the plans for stakeholder pensions. These will provide a "safety net" on top of the state pension and as an alternative to the State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme, but there is no timetable for their introduction. The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has already expressed concern that "the consultation document on ISAs seems to have been written entirely separately from the one on stakeholder pensions ... If these developments and initiatives could be brought together, it would be easier to develop a long-term strategy," it commented in its response to the pension proposals.

It would be far-sighted to develop a joint policy on all these reforms. But at the moment financial firms (and the Inland Revenue) must be terrified that any move in this direction might turn into an IT nightmare.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in