Royal SunAlliance profits slip
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Royal SunAlliance yesterday blamed what it called "the London bus syndrome" for a leap in claims in the third quarter of this year which caused its profits to slip.
The composite insurer said it had been hit by an unusually high number of claims, which cost pounds 93m, 79 per cent more than in the third quarter of 1996. This helped to push down profits over the nine months by pounds 3m to pounds 738m.
A company spokesman said: "We normally expect there to be a steady flow of reasonably large claims, such as fires and floods. But this year we have had an extraordinarily good first six months. Like the London buses all coming at once, we had all the claims between July and September."
Royal SunAlliance said the volcano eruption in Montserrat and large claims on UK property had boosted the claims figure. The company said it had also been hit by the strong pound because half of its general insurance and a third of its life insurance was sold abroad.
Investors drove down Royal SunAlliance shares by 19.5p to 580.5p. The drop of 2.5 per cent compared with a 1 per cent slide in the FTSE 100 index.
Some analysts said they were disappointed the insurer had as yet failed to deliver on a promised share buy-back. It said Budget changes to advanced corporation tax had to be digested first.
One analyst said: "The market is dissatisfied with the attitude and is unsure whether the company may be procrastinating. The proposal was made before the Budget but if the commitment remains to go ahead with the buy-back, the company should go on."
Other observers said performance in the US had been lacklustre. While last year's merger between Royal Insurance and Sun Alliance had produced savings of pounds 110m in line with expectations, the company needed a new focus, they added.
-
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments