Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Revenue chases forbidden fruits

Alison Eadie
Friday 17 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Personal equity plan managers are being told by the Inland Revenue that they have until 5 April to pull their money out of emerging markets that are not on its list of recognised stock exchanges - or lose their tax privileges.

Funds will be required to sell shares to ensure their assets are less than 50 per cent invested in these non-recognised exchanges. Failure to do so will threaten their eligibility for capital gains tax relief. Individuals who opted for self- invested emerging market PEPs will also lose their tax breaks.

The Revenue has told Pepma, the 101-strong PEP managers' association, that it intends to collect CGT on gains made in the 1993/4 tax year on PEPs that breached the rules. In its letter to the association, the Revenue says it will be writing to all PEP plan managers and "no-one involved will escape unscathed".

In a separate move earlier this month, the Revenue reached a private deal with the Association of Unit Trusts and Investment Funds and the Association of Investment Trusts Companies (Autif) over their members' liability to CGT. Three AITC members are believed to have agreed to pay CGT worth more than £530,000 for 1993/4. A further seven Autif members paid £50,000 between them.

Philip Warland, director-general of Autif, stressed that tax payments would be made by PEP managers, not individual investors. He said: "The PEP allowance of individual investors was unaffected even though people were invested in funds that were technically not PEPpable."

The Revenue has now asked Pepma to help it to track down PEP managers who have breached the rules. Those most likely to be affected are private- client stockbrokers with self-select or advisory PEPs. Some could face CGT bills for thousands of pounds.

The tax liability arose because of confusion caused by a Revenue rule change in April 1993. This required PEP managers to divest from "non-qualifying" investments, including gilts and non-recognised stock exchanges.

Some managers assumed the approved list of securities markets was issued by their regulatory body, the Securities and Investments Board. It later emerged that the Revenue had its own list of recognised stock exchanges, which excluded four markets on the SIB list.

The four markets - Mexico, Malaysia, South Korea and Thailand - have attracted a significant proportion of the money that flowed into emerging market funds during the peak of the boom in those areas in 1992-93. Last October the Revenue finally recognised these four markets, but is sticking to its plans to claw back CGT arising from investments in them during 1993/4.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in