Reporting guidelines for directors are simplified
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DIRECTORS of quoted companies will be forced to say in the annual report that they are responsible for the system of internal financial control, under revised guidelines published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales yesterday.
The new guidance, which would also require directors to describe the procedures in place, is a response to the heavy criticism of the original draft issued last October. This was drawn up by the working party established to decide how companies should comply with the recommendations on internal control in the Cadbury report. Companies and their auditors particularly attacked the plan to require directors to give an opinion on the effectiveness of the system of internal control.
Paul Rutteman, the Ernst & Young partner who chaired the working party, denied that the document had been watered down. 'It will probably be more useful in the way it will work,' he said, adding that it should focus directors' minds on their responsibilities. Others were sceptical of its effect, seeing it only as a stepping stone towards better monitoring.
Gerry Acher, head of UK auditing and accounting at KPMG Peat Marwick, said the replacement of a 70-page document with one of only seven pages setting out principles rather than detailed rules was welcome. But he was concerned that the paper still encouraged directors to give an opinion on the effectiveness of controls. He was also worried about the 'subjectivity' inherent in the recommendation that directors should disclose weaknesses that might lead to material loss.
Comments on the paper should be submitted by 31 October.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments