Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rentokil attempts to `cherry pick' BET

Russell Hotten
Thursday 22 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rentokil's pounds 1.8bn bid for BET was thrown into confusion yesterday after it emerged that an attempt to reach an agreed deal had been rejected.

Lazards, Rentokil's advisers, approached Barings, BET's advisers, on Wednesday in an effort to reach a recommended deal for BET's textile, distribution and security businesses. But analysts voiced surprise that Rentokil should seek to "cherry pick" BET businesses so soon after launching a hostile bid that included strong criticism of BET's management record.

Rentokil's cash and shares offer for its rival was forced into the open last Thursday by the Takeover Panel after a dramatic rise in the BET share price. Rentokil said it wanted an agreed deal, but less than 24 hours later went hostile, fiercely criticising BET's record under chief executive John Clark.

Nigel Utley, analyst at Greig Middleton, described this latest move by Rentokil as "a complete non-starter." The severe criticisms which Clive Thompson, Rentokil's chief executive, had made of BET, were "clearly not going to enamour them to a friendly approach."

Rentokil said it was doing the best thing for shareholders. "It was important that we should attempt to get around the table," said a spokesman. Rentokil's primary aim remained to acquire the whole of BET, and the approach for selected businesses did not mean the others would be put up for sale.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in