Regulator voices worry over PIA
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FIMBRA, the regulator of financial advisers, yesterday expressed its concern that financial practitioners will be denied a full role in running the Personal Investment Authority, the body that hopes to take on responsibility for safeguarding private savings, writes Paul Durman.
Fimbra said it attached great importance, in the interest of effective investor protection, to a full participation of practitioners in the system of self-regulation. 'It is vital that there should be a full involvement of practitioners in the committee and working parties of the PIA and that these should report directly to the PIA board,' it said.
Two weeks ago, Jim Stretton of Standard Life, the UK's second-largest life insurer, resigned from the PIA because of its determination to dilute industry involvement in favour of allegedly unaccountable public interest representatives.
Fimbra is also worried that too much power will reside with the PIA's executive, in particular Colette Bowe, the new chief executive who has joined from the Securities and Investments Board, the senior financial regulator.
The PIA is said to be planning to regulate without the standing committees - on training, competence and sales practices - to which many in the financial services industry have grown accustomed. There are fears that ad hoc policy- making procedures will weaken accountability and strengthen executive control, especially if committees are required to report to Ms Bowe instead of the PIA board.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments