Rail access charges 'too high'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rail access charges 'too high'
Labour today called for major changes in the system of rail finances. Shadow transport secretary Michael Meacher said track access charges in the run-up to privatisation were being set too high. He blamed a new system for covering the depreciation of assets for forcing up costs to the train- operating companies, which run the services. The system, called "modern equivalent asset value," puts the annual depreciation cost at pounds 700m, compared to just pounds 160 million in British Rail's statement for last year. In a report on rail finances, Mr Meacher said up to pounds 500m of the rise in public subsidy to the railways was accounted for by the rise in depreciation charges. But instead of the money being earmarked specifically for buying new assets, the money went to Railtrack, which is responsible for the rail infrastructure, and could eventually end up in the pockets of private shareholders.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments