Quake costs worsen for Lloyd's
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lloyd's of London is set to be hit harder than first expected by the earthquake that devasted Kobe, Japan's second largest port, earlier this week.
In a statement in the immediate aftermath of the quake, Richard Keeling, a leading catastrophe underwriter, said: "The Japanese market is highly regulated, with 98 per cent of cover provided by domestic insurers."
However, a spokesman for Lloyd's yesterday conceded that those figures applied only to property claims. They do not acount for marine business and agricultural business.
Within property, the figures only apply to primary insurance cover. Many Japanese insurers will have reinsured themselves in London.
The cost to marine insurers is likely to be high, as much of Kobe port has suffered from liquefaction, which occurs when subsoil mixes with water, causing buildings and infrastructure to sink.
Marine costs will also include damaged cargo containers and their contents, as well as possible damage to ships.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments