QMH rescue hit by blunder: Resolutions passed at recent meetings found to be invalid
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.QUEENS Moat Houses' reconstruction plans were thrown into embarrassing confusion last night when the company admitted that resolutions passed at annual meetings were invalid.
An extraordinary meeting of shareholders may have to be called to sort out the mess, but the company said it would not disrupt the timescale for the current pounds 1.3bn refinancing talks with its 65 banks.
The confusion arose after it was discovered that certain preference shareholders had a unique right to attend ordinary shareholders' meetings. This right was not spotted by the company's solicitors, Allen & Overy, and there is now serious doubt whether the firm will continue to act for Queens Moat.
In a statement last night Queens Moat said: 'In the circumstances, the company has appointed Freshfields and leading counsel to assist the directors in resolving the complex issues raised.'
At an annual meeting on 26 August last year, Queens Moat's ordinary shareholders voted to increase the company's borrowing limits to pounds 2bn. It is now known that the resolution was invalid because holders of 7 per cent convertible preference shares were not invited to attend.
The company said the validity of other resolutions passed at the meeting, and at the reconvened AGM on 29 November last year, was also being reviewed.
Holders of the preference shares, 19 million of which were issued in 1985, were given a right to attend ordinary shareholders' meetings if a resolution at a meeting was likely to affect their interests. This right was overlooked by Allen & Overy. A similar oversight, this time by Clifford Chance, was made for the annual meeting in 1989. Resolutions passed at this meeting are also under review.
The oversight was discovered by Allen & Overy and was said to have nothing to do with Gary Klesch, the arbitrageur buying up Queens Moat stock, who has threatened legal action over unspecified matters.
The preference shareholders were said to be standard institutional investors, and Queens Moat was expecting quick co-operation. A Queens Moat spokesman said it was not yet known whether the company would need to call an extraordinary meeting or separate class meeting for the preference shareholders. 'This has only been brought to our attention in the last few days and there are still many legal matters to be sifted through.' He did not know which other resolutions would be declared invalid.
The company said that 'the validity and effectiveness of the group's existing borrowings cannot be called into question.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments