Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prosecution obsessive, QC claims

Monday 03 October 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

GEORGE WALKER, former head of Brent Walker, and his finance chief, Wilfred Aquilina, were subjected to an 'obsessive and oppressive' prosecution, a court was told yesterday.

Roy Amlot QC, defending Mr Aquilina, said that the Serious Fraud Office had used a blunderbuss of a conspiracy charge covering a six-year period and involving allegations of a multi-million- pound profit fraud and its subsequent cover-up.

Mr Amlot told the jury at Southwark Crown Court that the Crown's tunnel-vision approach had seen the presentation of a theory followed by efforts to make everything fit into it. The trial had featured allegations that 'obsessively and myopically' concentrated on Brent Walker's film division. Nothing had been said as to what the entertainments business had really been involved in.

Mr Amlot said it was accepted by the prosecution that Mr Aquilina had not made a penny from his alleged dishonesty. 'What sort of a fraud is it where the Crown say that after six years he made nothing out of it?'

The trial was adjourned until Thursday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in