Promotion to cost Hoover pounds 28m more than planned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HOOVER admitted yesterday that its ill-fated free flights offer had cost pounds 48m, more than double the pounds 20m it put aside a year ago to cover the cost of the promotion.
A spokesman for Maytag, Hoover's US parent, said there might be further provisions but would not quantify them. However, Richard Rankin, co-chairman of the task force set up to sort out the fiasco, pledged that when the promotion ended on 30 April, everyone who had complied with the terms and conditions of the offer would have been made an offer of free flights.
The disclosure in Maytag's full- year figures of the final cost confirmed expectations that a pounds 20m provision in last year's first-quarter figures would prove inadequate.
Hoover said 220,000 people had either flown or been booked on flights as a result of an unexpectedly popular promotion that offered two free flights to anyone who spent more than pounds 100 on a Hoover product.
The offer became a farce after thousands bought appliances solely to take advantage of the promotion. Hoover had to create a team of 250 staff overnight to cope with the deluge of applicants.
The scheme became a case study in how not to run a promotion after a torrent of bad publicity followed complaints from hundreds of customers that they were not being offered flights to which they were entitled.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments