Profits kept low in electricals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT IS difficult to make money in the electricals retailing sector because of an outmoded adversarial approach to negotiations between the big retailers, such as Dixons and Comet, and their suppliers, writes John Willcock.
In other retail sectors suppliers and sellers have worked together over the years to develop mutually benefical relationships. But electrical suppliers and sellers have kept their distance, and this has kept margins down, according to Verdict Research, a commercial research company.
The head-to-head clash between Dixons and Comet has also kept a downward pressure on prices, says Verdict. Electricals manufacturing is an international business involving powerful brands, but overcapacity exists in the UK, which is exploited by Dixons and Comet.
Verdict says that such a duopoly is 'unhealthy' and it welcomes the growing competition from the regional electricity companies, such as Norweb and Scottish Power.
The Office of Fair Trading has launched its investigation into warranties not because of allegations of overcharging, according to Verdict, but because retailers have been pushing their own guarantee schemes ahead of the suppliers' own services.
Verdict says: 'We believe the investigation will highlight the ridiculous imbalance between gross margins on product (under 30 per cent) and warranties (over 40 per cent).
'To provide comprehensive warranties retailers need to employ an in- house repair/service operation or a third-party contractor. This costs money and consumers cannot expect this service for free. On the other hand we would argue that there is a strong case for gradually raising gross margins on product and realigning prices on warranties to produce a better balanced profits stream.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments