Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Privatisation issue holds up nuclear industry review: Treasury and DTI at odds over terms of promised inquiry

Mary Fagan,Industrial Correspondent
Sunday 30 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GOVERNMENT'S long-awaited review of the nuclear industry is being further delayed because of a disagreement in Whitehall over whether it should look again at privatising Nuclear Electric, the state-owned generator.

The Treasury is thought to be keen to examine the potential for a sale, which some industry observers say could raise up to pounds 3bn. The Department of Trade and Industry favours a narrower remit for the review, but addressing issues including the use of private money for investment in nuclear plant.

Nuclear Electric was formed five years ago after Britain's nuclear power stations were hastily withdrawn from the privatisation of the electricity industry.

The embarrassing retreat was fuelled by fears over the high cost of nuclear-based electricity and the liabilities shareholders could face because of the massive cost of decommissioning plant and managing the waste. The Government promised a review of the industry in 1994 and subsequently brought the date forward to last year.

However, the terms of the review have yet to be published and Timothy Eggar, the energy minister, said last week: 'It has turned out to be more complex than anticipated.'

Mr Eggar told the Trade and Industry Select Committee: 'We have had a large number of representations on what the review should cover from every conceivable point of view.' He said that no decision has been taken whether nuclear power should be privatised.

The minister has clashed with Nuclear Electric over the company's persistent lobbying to be privatised. It has 25 per cent of the electricity generating market in England and Wales and has been courting the City in recent months. It hopes that it can interest the private sector in financing a second pressurised water reactor at Sizewell in Suffolk.

Nuclear Electric is cutting 2,000 jobs this year and has increased its operating efficiency. The company says that it will be ready for privatisation in 1995. Operating profit in the first half of the year rose 95 per cent to pounds 497m from pounds 255m a year earlier.

However, without a subsidy of pounds 615m, which is raised through a levy on electricity bills, the result in the half-year would have been a loss of pounds 118m. The levy, more than pounds 1bn a year, expires in 1998.

Besides the privatisation issue, the review is thought to have been held back by the furore over British Nuclear Fuels' Thorp reprocessing plant in Cumbria.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in