People and Business: Figures are off the Railtracks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHO SAID there were lies, damned lies and statistics? Probably a railwayman in the new privatised era, if recent events are anything to go by.
Railtrack's much-vaunted 10-year Network Management Statement promised pounds 27bn of investment, but critics swiftly narrowed it down to just pounds 1.4bn of new money or pounds 140m a year.
One of the major losers was Rail Freight Group, which was offered very little in terms of copper-bottomed promises of new money. But the cover- sheet of a 30-page document from Rail Freight Group attacking Railtrack's plans, published today, scores an own-goal. Under the heading "Our six most important conclusions," it lists - you guessed it - just five.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments