Pensions permit mooted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FINANCIAL advisers may have to get special permission from a new investment watchdog before they are allowed to sell pensions.
The crackdown is being discussed by the Personal Investment Authority, which will take over regulation of advisers next year. Its proposal follows a report last week that showed sales of more than nine out of 10 personal pensions to people opting out of company schemes did not meet acceptable standards of advice, because they was based on inadequate information.
The proposal involves making pensions a special category. Advisers would have to prove their expertise before talking to clients on the subject.
A PIA spokesman said the matter was still at the discussion stage: 'It was not found to be necessary in the past, but it may become necessary now.'
The regulator's move has won the support of one insurance company, Albany Life. Its marketing director, Malcolm Kerr, said: 'Pensions are a very complex area and we would back any initiative that would bring about improvements in advice.'
Albany has sold more than 100,000 personal pensions since 1988 but has not had to compensate a client for transferring money out of a public-sector scheme.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments