Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pay falls as directors lose bonuses

Roger Trapp
Wednesday 08 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MORE than a quarter of top executives saw their pay cut over the past year, usually through the loss of most or all of the previous year's bonus, according to a new study published yesterday.

Two per cent of the directors lost 30 per cent or more, while nearly a fifth saw their pay fall by up to 10 per cent.

The 1992 Board of Directors Study UK, published by the executive search consultancy Korn/Ferry International, also found that the spread of earnings for people doing comparable jobs in companies of about the same size had widened over the past year. Better-paid directors generally received larger increases.

Size is the dominant influence on pay levels, with type of business and other factors, such as overseas diversification, counting for little.

Overall pay increased by amounts above the inflation rate. The median increase was 8 to 10 per cent and directors handling particular functions seemed to receive bigger increases than chief executives and divisional directors.

Performance-related bonus schemes seemed to have played a crucial role in reducing earnings of some executives.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in