Parcel post comes under threat of VAT
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MICHAEL Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, may be forced to tax Christmas. His privatisation plans for the Post Office will add to pressure to put VAT on parcel post.
A spokesman for the Department of Trade and Industry said: 'VAT on parcels is something that we are considering. It's a complex issue, and no decision has been taken yet. But we have acknowledged that it is an issue.'
When he announced a Green Paper on Post Office privatisation in the House of Commons on Thursday, Mr Heseltine said: 'I can assure the House that under any proposals we finally adopt, stamps will continue to be exempt from VAT.'
But Department of Trade and Industry officials concede privately that they will come under considerable pressure to put VAT on parcels sent commercially, so that Parcelforce can be seen to be competing on equal terms with private-sector competitors such as Securicor, TNT and Great Universal Stores.
Without extending VAT in that way, the Post Office operation would continue to have a 17.5 per cent price advantage in selling its services to individuals and VAT-exempt organisations. These include charities, hospitals, banks and insurance companies.
The problem is that it is hard to distinguish between commercial parcels and those sent by individuals as presents.
By promising to keep stamps VAT-free, Mr Heseltine has made a solution more difficult. He could otherwise have set a price or weight threshold for VAT to apply.
However, industry sources were confident that parcels falling within the VAT net could be accepted for posting with a proof of payment other than a stamp.
George Brown, secretary of the Post Office Users' National Council, said: 'This is something you are right to question. As far as we know, it's an unsettled area, and we need more clarification from Heseltine. One could deduce that the question of VAT on parcels has been glossed over because people put stamps on parcels. But it doesn't have to be that way.'
Last week KNP, the Dutch postal and telecommunications service, announced that it was to privatise. A spokesman said that it has to charge VAT on items over the 500-gram limit on its monopoly.
Royal Mail/Parcelforce would gain if it had to register for VAT, as it could then offset payments of tax on its expenses against its VAT receipts. At present, like any unregistered individual, it has to pay VAT on goods or services from VAT- registered suppliers. That discourages the Post Office from subcontracting work.
(Photograph omitted)
Second round, page 3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments