Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Page deepens doubt over bill on prompt-payment

Peter Rodgers Business Editor
Monday 05 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PETER RODGERS

Business Editor

Richard Page, the Department of Trade and Industry's small firms minister, yesterday used Michael Heseltine's admission that as a businessman he had deliberately delayed paying bills to back the Government's scepticism about prompt-payment legislation.

Mr Page, a businessman himself, said: "What the Deputy Prime Minister has been saying is a snapshot of the real world where companies operating on the knife-edge of survival do things to ensure their continued existence."

Calling Mr Heseltine's controversial admission "frank and candid" Mr Page said it showed that the Government was living in the "real world of day-to-day business rather than in some theoretical concept. It is this hands-on experience that is being turned to good effect to help small businessmen and women."

Mr Page said responses to a consultation exercise in 1993 on whether to legislate against late payment showed views deeply divided and no clear consensus for the legal right to interest that some small firms lobbies have demanded.

There was concern that legislation to force prompt payment would be used mainly against small businesses, and that larger firms would simply extend their credit terms, Mr Page said.

The Government has announced a series of voluntary measures to improve payment, in co-operation with industry, but has repeatedly made clear that it will legislate if these fail. Last month Mr Page started a review of the first two years of the voluntary measures, and he has asked for comments by the end of this month.

Tony Bonner, who today takes over as chairman of the CBI's small and medium firms council, said the employers continued to be against a statutory right to interest on late payments, because it formalised the financial arrears as a loan, increased the costs of the business and from the administrative point of view could be a nightmare.

He said he had seen businesses delay payment to creditors, which was "bad news because it creates bad will among suppliers and does not help companies grow."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in