Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Overseas blow for pension funds

Magnus Grimond
Thursday 02 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The average UK pension fund would have been better keeping its clients' money at home last year, according to figures published today.

Despite outperforming in most major markets, the overseas exposure dragged down the overall return as the UK emerged as the best-performing global market. The inflation-beating 11.3 per cent overall return from pension fund assets still remained far short of the 16.6 per cent return from the FTSE All-share index of UK equities - this despite a rare year when fund managers outperformed the domestic index with their UK equity portfolios, recording an average 17 per cent growth.

George Urquhart of WM Company, the pension fund performance measurement group that produced the figures, said the last time pension funds outperformed was in 1992. "Taken over the last 10 years, the average UK pension fund underperformed the index by 0.5 per cent yearly. But most of that is dealing expenses."

Even so, his colleague, WM director Peter Warrington, remained determinedly optimistic. "Historically, active managers have on occasion underperformed the index. But in 1996 they have reaped handsome dividends by avoiding the poorer performing stocks in the FTSE 100 index," he said. Reflecting their more limited exposure to property and more active management, smaller funds outdid their larger brethren by 0.5 per cent.

Mr Warrington highlighted the real 9 per cent average return over last year's inflation figure of around 2 per cent as good news for pensioners and companies. It easily beat the 2 to 3 per cent real growth regarded as a good long-term return by actuaries, he said, and meant many companies could continue with pension contribution holidays.

However, institutions are turning more bearish. WM said many have taken profits in the rising markets and kept the money in cash, which has risen from 4.5 per cent to 5.8 per cent of average portfolios.

Mr Warrington said this supported the widespread belief that large markets, particularly the US and UK, are overvalued.

The WM survey covered around three-quarters of UK pension funds, some 1,400 funds. Collectively, the industry is estimated to represent a little under a third of the whole UK stock market, just behind the life insurance companies with somewhat over a third.

The figure for UK equities compares with a 23.8 per cent return in 1995 and an 18.9 per cent average return over the past 20 years. Investment in the domestic market has remained largely static at 53.8 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in